Prova de Especialidade – Acampamento em Baixas Temperaturas
Prova de Especialidade – Acampamento I
Prova de Especialidade – Acampamento Ii
Prova de Especialidade – Acampamento Iii
Prova de Especialidade – Acampamento Iv
Prova de Especialidade – Acampamento Seguro
Prova de Especialidade – Acampamento Seguro Avancado
Prova de Especialidade – Administracao
Prova de Especialidade – Adoracao Crista
Prova de Especialidade – Aeromodelismo
Prova de Especialidade – Agricultura
Prova de Especialidade – Agricultura Familiar de Subsistencia
Prova de Especialidade – Alerta Vermelho
Prova de Especialidade – Alfabetizacao
Prova de Especialidade – Algas
Prova de Especialidade – Alivio da Fome
Prova de Especialidade – Alvenaria
Prova de Especialidade – Anfibios
Prova de Especialidade – Anfibios Avancado
Prova de Especialidade – Animais Ameacados de Extincao
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.