Prova de Especialidade – Aves Domesticas
Prova de Especialidade – Bacterias
Prova de Especialidade – Briofitas
Prova de Especialidade – Cactos
Prova de Especialidade – Cactos Avancado
Prova de Especialidade – Caes
Prova de Especialidade – Camelos
Prova de Especialidade – Cetaceos
Prova de Especialidade – Citologia
Prova de Especialidade – Climatologia
Prova de Especialidade – Climatologia Avancado
Prova de Especialidade – Conservacao Ambiental
Prova de Especialidade – Crustaceos
Prova de Especialidade – Dinossauros
Prova de Especialidade – Ecologia
Prova de Especialidade – Ecologia Avancado
Prova de Especialidade – Energias Renovaveis
Prova de Especialidade – Equinodermos
Prova de Especialidade – Ervas
Prova de Especialidade – Estuario
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.